The decision to include both a large competitive gym and a smaller instructional gym is based on evidence-driven design principles that promote physical activity, student engagement, and long-term operational flexibility. It is important to note that the cost of the larger competitive gym is not covered through the bond passed last November. The district will fund this additional expense through PPEL/SAVE resources.

​

The smaller instructional gym is purposefully designed for early childhood and elementary learners. It offers a comfortable, age-appropriate environment that encourages movement, participation, and skill development in a space tailored to their physical and developmental needs.

​

The larger competitive gym, while also supporting instructional use, is designed for building-wide activities such as full-school assemblies, indoor recess during inclement weather, and district-wide events. Its size and layout make it suitable for staff gatherings, athletic competitions, and community programming—including parks and recreation leagues, club practices, and tournaments.

​

This dual-gym approach aligns with key principles outlined in the Physical Activity Design Guidelines for School Architecture (Brittin et al., 2015), emphasizing flexibility, visibility, and right-sizing. By designing with intentionality, the school and district ensure that each space serves a distinct yet complementary role—supporting physical education, optimizing scheduling, and delivering long-term value for students and the broader community.